<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Black Hole Thoughts &#187; Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackholethoughts.com/tag/press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackholethoughts.com</link>
	<description>Ruminations that are never and forever falling into the rabbit hole.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Pay Czar Fails to Exclude Fox News</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/23/obamas-pay-czar-fails-to-exclude-fox-news/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/23/obamas-pay-czar-fails-to-exclude-fox-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you still swoon at the site of him.  Or maybe, like Chris Matthews, you still get chills up your leg when you hear the &#8220;Great One&#8221; speak.  But perhaps, what he&#8217;s been doing recently has caused you to pause.</p>
<p>No, he is not consulting with the very same generals he charged with exploring what to do next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you still swoon at the site of him.  Or maybe, like <a title="Chris Matthews gets a thrill up his leg from listening to Obama speak" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m9Gbb6NSwM" target="_blank">Chris Matthews</a>, you still get chills up your leg when you hear the &#8220;Great One&#8221; speak.  But perhaps, what he&#8217;s been doing recently has caused you to pause.</p>
<p>No, he is <a title="Obama is not meeting with Gates" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704500604574485461450697346.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" target="_blank">not consulting with the very same generals</a> he charged with exploring what to do next in Afghanistan.  Nor is he addressing the real concerns of our health care system like tort reform, allowing health care insurance companies to compete fairly across all 50 states, and ending support for illegal aliens.  No, he is not attending to serious work worthy of the Office of the White House.</p>
<p>Instead, he is trying to strong arm the the news outlets to print and report what he wants.  That is petty and unworthy of the President of the United States.  <a title="Obama wants to control the Press" href="http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/" target="_blank">As I described earlier this week</a>, Obama has sent a message to all news media when he and his administraiton attacked Fox News over the last couple of weeks.  The message was: disagree with me at your own risk.</p>
<p>But wow was I impressed this week when the <em>media stood up to the White House</em>.  It&#8217;s not been heavily reported on, but you can learn about it on <a title="Administration Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/23/white-house-loses-bid-exclude-fox-news-pay-czar-interview/" target="_blank">Fox News&#8217; Website</a>.  Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Compensation Czar&#8221;, Kenneth Feinberg, attmepted to exclude Fox News from using the network pool during an interview.  This particular network pool has been used by the five networks for years.  Well, good for them for standing up to Obama!</p>
<p>Why did they do it?  I think it&#8217;s obvious.  These other networks realized that once Fox News falls, they would be next.  And that&#8217;s when Obama would have the control over the Press he craves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/23/obamas-pay-czar-fails-to-exclude-fox-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now the White House Wants to Control the Press</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that can&#8217;t be true.  That must be more anti-Obama dribble.  Unfortunately, when you look back over the last few weeks, it&#8217;s hard to avoid that conclusion.  The White House&#8217;s David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel pounded Fox News again this past weekend.  While simmering for months, this fight exploded a couple of weeks ago when Anita Dunn claimed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that can&#8217;t be true.  That must be more anti-Obama dribble.  Unfortunately, when you look back over the last few weeks, it&#8217;s hard to avoid that conclusion.  The White House&#8217;s <a title="David Axelrod: Fox News &quot;Not Really A News Station&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-w7-G8PLyc" target="_blank">David Axelrod</a> and <a title="Rahm Emanuel on White House's War with Fox News" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzKc-kxEP1A" target="_blank">Rahm Emanuel</a> pounded Fox News again this past weekend.  While simmering for months, this fight exploded a couple of weeks ago when Anita Dunn claimed that the Fox News Channel is &#8220;opinion journalism masquerading as news,&#8221; and then said:</p>
<blockquote><p>The reality of it is, Fox News often operates as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican party</p></blockquote>
<p>She goes on to refer to Fox News as the &#8220;<a title="Anita Dunn: Fox News is not a news organization" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls" target="_blank">opposition</a>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s obvious then that the <a title="Fox 'not really news,' says Axelrod" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28417.html" target="_blank">White House</a> doesn&#8217;t want the rest of the media to consider Fox News a <em>news</em> station.  That should send shivers down your spine.</p>
<p>If it didn&#8217;t, it should have.  Let me explain why.  First, what is the White House trying to achieve?  Doesn&#8217;t it seem <a title="Anita Dunn: Fox News Is &quot;Research Arm of the Republican Party&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls" target="_blank">petty and beneath the office of the President of the United States of America</a> to be criticizing one particular news organization?  So then why are they doing it?</p>
<p>Three reasons (hat tip to<a title="White House: Media shouldn't follow Fox" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28497.html" target="_blank">Josh Gerstein and Mike Allen of Politico</a> for pointing this out):</p>
<ol>
<li>Redirect certain liberals, who may feel President Obama has abandoned them, by focusing them on Fox News</li>
<li>Keep Fox News, which is so often critical of Obama&#8217;s administration, on the defensive</li>
<li>And most importantly, send a message to other journalists who might be considering following in the the footsteps of Fox News</li>
</ol>
<p>Now certainly, that third one should have gotten your attention.  Let&#8217;s review how the press is supposed to work in the U.S.A.:</p>
<ol>
<li>The First Amendment to the Constitution of this country affords the people with the freedom of the press.</li>
<li>In return for free press, it is the responsibility of journalists to challenge our elected and non-elected government officials.</li>
<li>And it is the responsibility of the people to reject any attempts by the government to influence or control the press, or for the press to collude with the government.  Socialist, communist and essentially all totalitarian governments ensure their grasp on power by controlling the information that their citizens consume.</li>
</ol>
<p>We&#8217;re not quite to the point of #3 above, but we are surely moving toward it.  And that&#8217;s what&#8217;s so scary.</p>
<p>Notice that the White House <em>did not comment </em>on CNN or MSNBC when they falsely attributed racist comments to Rush Limbaugh without any fact checking.  Neither of those organization has even apologized or retracted those reports.  Instead, the White House is focusing its attention on just one news organization, Fox News.  So clearly, there is a double standard here.</p>
<p>If you are a news organization, what you are hearing is: if you agree with the White House, then you are safe.  If you ask difficult or uncomfortable questions, then the White House will slap you down.</p>
<p>Forget transparency.  Forget change.  The message is: <em>Don&#8217;t question us</em>.</p>
<p>What should we the people do?  In response to this blatant arrogance and disrespect for our freedoms, we should join together and let the President know that his administration is moving in an extremely dangerous direction.  Call the <a title="Contact the White House" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/" target="_blank">White House, or email them</a>.  Don&#8217;t let them tread on our Consitution.</p>
<p>Sources: <a title="Today’s Qs for O’s WH – 10/20/2009" href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/todays-qs-for-os-wh-10202009.html" target="_blank">ABC&#8217;s Jake Tapper poses question to Robert Gibbs</a>, <a title="Obama Advisers Say Fox News Isn't News" href="http://news.aol.com/article/white-house-advisers-say-fox-news-is-not/722055" target="_blank">AOL News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
