<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Black Hole Thoughts &#187; US Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackholethoughts.com/category/politics/us-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackholethoughts.com</link>
	<description>Ruminations that are never and forever falling into the rabbit hole.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Liberal Lies, America Dies</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/02/01/liberal-lies-america-dies/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/02/01/liberal-lies-america-dies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the others continue to put forth lies, hoping that if they keep saying them, eventually we will just accept them as fact.</p>
<p>This is a tactic used by the left-biased media as well.  For example, according to the media, who was it that duped us into entering a false war with Iraq?  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the others continue to put forth lies, hoping that if they keep saying them, eventually we will just accept them as fact.</p>
<p>This is a tactic used by the left-biased media as well.  For example, according to the media, who was it that duped us into entering a false war with Iraq?  President Bush, of course!</p>
<p>Really?  This isn&#8217;t ancient history.  These events occurred just a few years ago, during a technological era that includes 24-hour cable news channels and the ubiquitous Web.  And yet, the truth is buried in an onslaught of repetitive accusations that Bush and  Cheney mislead us into a war with Iraq for:</p>
<ul>
<li>Revenge against making assassination attempt on George H. W. Bush</li>
<li>Oil</li>
<li>Lucrative contracts for Halliburton, a company Cheney was CEO and Chairman of until 2000</li>
</ul>
<p>Hmmmm.  Let’s see if we can roll-back in time, back to the late 1990s and see what we find.  Year after year, during President Clinton’s second term, the U.N. passed security resolutions against Iraq for failing to cooperate with investigators from IAEA.</p>
<p>All the while, the U.N.’s “Oil for Food” program continued.  Remember that one?  The one that was found to be full of corruption?  And the evidence for this corruption came to light after the U.S. invaded Iraq.  But I digress…</p>
<p>So, U.N. resolution after U.N. resolution was passed by Russia, Germany, France, and the U.S. under President Clinton.  Finally, in 2002, the U.N. passed <a title="U.N. Resolution 1441" href="http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2002/sc2002.htm" target="_blank">security resolution 1441</a>that cited breaches related not only to Weapons of Mass Destruction (right on page one of the resolution), but to other violations as well.  The resolution passed unanimously, which included Arab states as well. Now remember, this is 2002, a year after 9/11.  President Clinton, Germany, Russia, France, et. al. had been all working off the same intel as President Bush.  And when Saddam Hussein chose to ignore 1441, Bush made the decision to go to war, citing the evidence for WMD in Iraq.  And with the approval of the Congress (Senate: 77-23 and House: 296-133), he did just that.</p>
<p>I hope that shines a light on how things get spun and twisted into lies to demonize those that oppose the liberal agenda.</p>
<p>So what are the current lies?</p>
<p>During President Obama&#8217;s recent SOTU address, had provided us with quite a few.  Besides sounding petulant, and once again blaming everything that’s going wrong on President Bush, he managed to throw out a few choice lies that cannot, and should not, be ignored.  My personal favorite:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.”</p>
<p>–President Obama, January 27<sup>th</sup>, 2010 SOTU</p></blockquote>
<p>Ben Shapiro points out in his <a title="Obama Lies" href="http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2010/01/28/obama-lies-about-the-supreme-court-media-blames-justice-alito/" target="_blank">article </a>that even the New York Times knew, as did Justice Alito, that Obama was lying.  As Ben put it, “When The New York Times is calling out a socialist president for lying, you know he’s in trouble.”</p>
<p>So what does the the mainstream media focus on?  The truth?  The Supreme Court decision?  The first amendment?  No, it distracts the public by repetitively attacking Justice Alito for mouthing the words, “That’s not true,” which leads people to believe that Obama was correct and the Supreme Court was wrong. Not only was Obama <em>wrong</em>, he had no right to attack the justices as they sat there mute in a State of the Union address.  There is a separation of powers for specific reasons, one of which is for checks and balances.  The SOTU was not the forum for this kind of behavior.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court made a careful decision, excluding foreign corporations or corporations owned by foreign corporations.  They were right on target with their interpretation of the first amendment.  The reality is, however, that Obama just plain didn’t like it.  And like a child, he pouted and bullied, using the SOTU to emasculate the justices sitting powerless before him.  He revealed more than lies in his SOTU speech.</p>
<p>Personally, I found his behavior appalling.</p>
<p><strong>&#8211;This is part one of a series of articles.  Next up: How Obama lied about spending less.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/02/01/liberal-lies-america-dies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Ego Knows No Bounds</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/obama%e2%80%99s-ego-knows-no-bounds/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/obama%e2%80%99s-ego-knows-no-bounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Scott Brown, in his victory speech last night, said the following:</p>
<p>“In dealing with terrorists, our tax dollars should pay for weapons to stop them, not lawyers to defend them.”  &#8211;Scott Brown, U.S. Senator</p>
<p>Bravo!  That is the clear, common-sense thinking that got him elected in one of the purest blue states in our country.</p>
<p>In stark contrast, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Brown, in his victory speech last night, said the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>“In dealing with terrorists, our tax dollars should pay for weapons to stop them, not lawyers to defend them.”  &#8211;Scott Brown, U.S. Senator</p></blockquote>
<p>Bravo!  That is the clear, common-sense thinking that got him elected in one of the purest blue states in our country.</p>
<p>In stark contrast, President Obama <a title="Obama's Ego Looms Large in Interview" href="http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Politics/president-obama-scott-brown-massachusetts-victory/story?id=9611222" target="_blank">had this to say</a> in an ABC interview with George Stephanopoulos:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Here&#8217;s my assessment of not just the vote in Massachusetts, but the mood around the country: the same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office.”  &#8211;President Obama</p></blockquote>
<p>What?!  Is he serious?  Clearly his ego knows no bounds; how else could he so purposefully misinterpret the obvious message the voters in Massachusetts sent last night.  Or, is he trying to steal some of the glow from Scott Brown?  What’s obvious is that the people of Massachusetts, along with the rest of the country, are upset with Obama, his policies and those of Pelosi, Reid, Rangel, Barney Frank, et. al.</p>
<p>But Obama wasn’t done.  He went on to say this:</p>
<blockquote><p>“People are angry and they are frustrated. Not just because of what&#8217;s happened in the last year or two years, but what&#8217;s happened over the last eight years.”  &#8211;President Obama</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yes he did.  Yet again, our “leader” blamed the previous administration for his own policy failures.  Any parent of a little child has heard this before.  The “supposedly” most powerful man in the world continues to act like a little kid saying, “It’s not my fault.”  When will he actually become a real leader?  Mr. President, We’re waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/obama%e2%80%99s-ego-knows-no-bounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coakley is the Loser in the Massachusetts Senate Race</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/coakley-is-the-loser-in-the-massachusetts-senate-race/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/coakley-is-the-loser-in-the-massachusetts-senate-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts Senate Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The liberals are already pointing fingers and laying blame.  Good for them.</p>
<p>Scott Brown has won a tremendous race, beating unbelievable odds, to become the 41st vote against Obama’s monstrosity, the so called “Health Care Bill”.  He must now live up to those campaign promises.</p>
<p>As for the Republicans, they have a lot to learn from Scott [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberals are already pointing fingers and laying blame.  Good for them.</p>
<p>Scott Brown has won a tremendous race, beating unbelievable odds, to become the 41<sup>st</sup> vote against Obama’s monstrosity, the so called “Health Care Bill”.  He must now live up to those campaign promises.</p>
<p>As for the Republicans, they have a lot to learn from Scott Brown, how he waged his campaign, what he said, and what he stands for.  And in order for this sea change to become legitimate and to continue on to the 2010 elections, the Republicans must listen to us, the conservative voice.</p>
<p>And for our part, the conservatives, we must not stop fighting.  We must not let the Republican Party ignore us.  The idea of a third party would be disastrous for conservatives, and only aid in liberal victories this November.  No, we must retake the Republican Party, Lincoln’s party, Reagan’s party, and return to our conservative roots.  We must stress a small federal government, individual liberty, individual responsibility, lower taxes, a stop to the ridiculous spending, and provide safe, secure borders for our citizens.</p>
<p>Tonight, we should be ecstatic over Brown’s win.  But tomorrow, we must wake ready to keep working for what we know is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/20/coakley-is-the-loser-in-the-massachusetts-senate-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We Listening to our Founding Fathers?</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/18/are-we-listening-to-our-founding-fathers/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/18/are-we-listening-to-our-founding-fathers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap and Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxine Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialized Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.&#8221; –George Washington</p>
<p>&#8220;A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.&#8221; –George Washington</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned &#8211; this is the sum of good government.&#8221; –Thomas Jefferson</p></blockquote>
<p>Our founding fathers were trying to warn us, their words echoing into our present.  But are we listening?  We would be wise to heed what they said lest we be doomed to repeat the history of those that came before us.</p>
<p>The liberals in power today proselytize about minorities and the under-privileged.  They seek to resolve all of the wrongs of yesterday and today by creating government programs that, like Superman swooping in to save us all, will make everyone have the same opportunities.</p>
<p>In fact, their record shows just the opposite.  They are, in fact, more aligned with big banks and the upper echelons of the labor unions, and have no interest in really helping the underlings on whose shoulders they stride.  Their programs of welfare and handouts serve only to create a far larger group of people who will be more incentivized to suckle the government’s teats, whose milk comes from our hard work.  The more who are unemployed, the more who are benefiting from government programs, the more that will vote for liberals to institute new government programs.  All of this ensures that liberals will receive more and more votes.</p>
<p>They wish to eradicate the idea of “individual responsibility”, and along with it, “individual liberty”.  That is what is behind the health care bill, the cap and trade bill, the stimulus bill, and more to come.  They are trying to change our country as quickly as possible before they lose their majority, because they know that once a bill is passed into law, it is far harder, if not impossible, to undo it.  And the sooner this country becomes one large mass who is dependent on the government for everything from breakfast to dinner, diapers to coffins, the more entrenched their party will become, until we are a single party government.  A politburo, to be exact.</p>
<p>Allow me to show you, remembering all the while that it is small business that has been the backbone for our free market, introducing new ideas, new inventions, innovating past obstacles, and employing our workers:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Health Insurance Bill</strong>.  Let&#8217;s start by making sure we are using the right terms.  This is not about health care reform.  All Americans have access to health care, some of the best health care in the world!  If the liberals were serious about this, they would ignore the money that was being jammed into their wallets by lobbyists working for the lawyers, and begin with something that really matters.  Talk to your doctor the next time you go in for a visit and say these two words: &#8220;tort reform.&#8221;  When you are done ducking, you will understand their pain.  Nor have the liberals addressed competition of insurance companies across all 50 states.  This bill will raise taxes on everyone, threaten fines and jail for those that do not pay into the system, and force small companies to lay off people, increasing unemployment.  Remember, small businesses will be the most hurt by this bill.  And the major piece, the real sticking point, is that it will put a bureaucrat between you and your own freedom of choice.  And yes, Wilson was right.  Obama lied.  The liberals want the illegal immigrants to be covered by this new health insurance bill.  Why?  That&#8217;s another piece to the puzzle, because by having this in the bill, illegals will continue to vote for liberals.</li>
<li><strong>Allowing Felons to vote</strong>.  Speaking of voting, several states, including Washington, are considering legislation that will let convicted felons vote.  Why?  Because these folks generally vote for liberals.</li>
<li><strong>Maxine Waters</strong>.  In 2008, Maxine Waters let slip what she is all about: <a title="Maxine Waters, the Socialist" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ" target="_blank">socializing the oil companies</a> (go to 1 minute into the video).  Taking over the energy companies is crucial to the liberals’ plans.  If we have to be dependent on the government for our own personal health and access to energy, we become slaves to the government.</li>
<li><strong>Pelosi</strong>.  Pelosi has become rather brazen lately.  She has openly attacked Americans, you and me, <a title="Pelosi: Town Hall Protesters Are &quot;Carrying Swastikas&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4UujNkWfGE" target="_blank">for exercising our right to question those that serve us in elected office</a>, and our right to protest decisions we don’t like.  She might need to be reminded of what when on <a title="Nancy's Nazi Shock: Did She Forget the Bush Years?" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/08/nancys_nazi_shock_did_she_forget_the_bush_years_97812.html" target="_blank">during Bush&#8217;s 8 years in office</a>.  When she became Speaker, she committed to have an open House of Representatives, and to ending slimy politics and corruption.  Under her watch, sleazy deals have been negotiated for the health insurance bill.  And it has been anything but open, isolating Republicans, even changing the locks on doors.  Have you seen President Obama go to closed door meetings with the liberals.  Are any Republicans allowed in?  Any cameras?  And with Rangel as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, she looks silly.  After all, he is being investigated by the House Ethics Committee for failing to report hundreds of thousands of dollars.  How ironic?!  If he were a Republican, the press would be having a field day with this one.</li>
<li><strong>President Obama</strong>.  Where to begin?  He has endangered the security of this country.  When the Christmas Day Bomber incident broke, it took him three days before he addressed the nation.  Three days?!  And it took him 3 or 4 speeches before he found the right tone.  Closing Guantanamo Bay sends a strong signal to our enemies that we are weak.  Mirandizing them sends an even stronger message that we aren’t willing to fight.  Calling these attacks the work of ‘lone nuts’ and saying that we are not in a War against Terrorism defeats us before we even begin to fight.  But the absolute worst thing Obama is doing now, the thing that will weaken us the most, is giving Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others a criminal trial in New York City, costing that city hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, insulting the innocent people that were killed on 9/11 and the families that survive them, and giving KSM a platform to voice his ridiculous propaganda.  Clearly, as Cheney says in this interview, we have a precedent for a military trial.  But no, instead we afford this horrible man, who admits to being the architect of 9/11, the rights reserved for our citizens, the very ones he plotted to kill.  And all the while a Navy SEAL, who was charged with allegedly punching a terrorist he captured, basically a national hero, is being sent to Iraq for a trial there.  How does this make any sense?  And no, there are zero witnesses to corroborate the terrorist’s claim he was punched, but his claim is however, straight out of Al-Qaeda’s playbook.</li>
<li><strong>President Obama Redux</strong>.  It doesn’t end with national security.  President Obama wants to pass a Cap and Trade Bill that will once again hit small businesses the hardest, and send millions of manufacturing jobs over to countries like India, Mexico and China, who have already said they will not follow Obama’s strict regulations on pollution.  So, we lose jobs to other countries creating more unemployment, Goldman Sachs and other ‘fat cats’ make money off of companies trading off their excess pollution, and the overall pollution of the earth is not changed one iota.  Hooray for Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p>There’s more.  Lots more.  Tonight, I am hopeful that Scott Brown will be elected to Massachusetts’s open Senatorial seat, breaking the super-majority that the liberals have in the Congress.  That may be enough to stop this monstrous health insurance bill, and maybe even the cap and trade disaster too.</p>
<p>Obama, Pelosi, Reid, they want to create a country where a small political elite lives well off the backs of everyone else.  There will be no innovators.  No awe-inspiring agendas like going to the moon.  The U.S. dollar will descend into oblivion.  We will no longer be a super power.  With equal opportunity for everyone, comes equal results from all of us.  Equal results.  Nothing extraordinary.</p>
<p>We, all of us, need to take back this country.  I see artists, musicians and actors wearing “Che” t-shirts, and now even “Mao” t-shirts.  They clearly don’t know their history because both men would have these very same artists, musicians and actors be the first people executed if they were in power today.  What’s a few more to the slaughter when you have killed 10 times the number of men, women and children that Hitler did?</p>
<p>If we do not study history, if we do not learn from those before us, we have no one to blame but ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/18/are-we-listening-to-our-founding-fathers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s and Napolitano&#8217;s New Security Tactics &#8212; Detaining Michael Yon</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/05/obamas-and-napolitanos-new-security-tactics-detaining-michael-yon/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/05/obamas-and-napolitanos-new-security-tactics-detaining-michael-yon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Yon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with Michael Yon, you should check him out immediately.  He is an independent photojournalist who has been embedded with our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for years, delivering gripping stories and photos of our amazing men and women putting their lives on the line to protect us.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a breaking story now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with <a title="Michael Yon" href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/" target="_blank">Michael Yon</a>, you should check him out immediately.  He is an independent photojournalist who has been embedded with our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for years, delivering gripping stories and photos of our amazing men and women putting their lives on the line to protect us.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a breaking story now where Michael Yon was detained at Seattle&#8217;s SeaTac airport by the TSA because he was unwilling to answer their questions.  What did they want to know?  How much money he earns.  What in the world does that have to do with national security?  When he refused to answer their inappropriate and unnecessary question, he was handcuffed and detained.  From Michael Yon&#8217;s Facebook page:</p>
<blockquote>
<div>When they handcuffed me, I said that no country has ever treated me so badly. Not China. Not Vietnam. Not Afghanistan. Definitely not Singapore or India or Nepal or Germany, not Brunei, not Indonesia, or Malaysia, or Kuwait or Qatar or United Arab Emirates. No county has treated me with the disrespect can that can be expected from our border bullies. &#8211;Michael Yon</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Perhaps Obama and Napolitano should consider asking for help, because clearly, they are out of their depth on securing the borders of this country.  What are we doing with the Christmas Day Bomber?  We&#8217;ve put him in the criminal justice system, affording him the full rights of a U.S. citizen, and talking about giving him a plea bargain.  Really?!</p>
<p>We are quickly becoming the laughing stock of the world, and our enemies are becoming more and more emboldened by Obama&#8217;s tactics.  Not only does asking someone about their yearly earnings have nothing to do with national security, but it tramples on our constitutional rights and freedoms.  In response to the Christmas Bomber, our &#8220;<em>leaders</em>&#8220; have implemented mostly useless and reactive measures.  In contrast, the terrorists who, despite Obama&#8217;s words to the contrary, are clearly at war with us, and continue to plan new ways to hurt innocent Americans.</p>
<p>Might we suggest that they focus their attentions on the <em>groups of people who are actually trying to blow people up on planes</em>, and not on <em>returning U.S. citizens</em>?</p>
<p>UPDATE: The <a title="Michale Yon Exclusive Interview" href="http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/05/exclusive-interview-military-blogger-michael-yon-detained-by-tsa-in-seattle-airport/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+%28Big+Government%29" target="_blank">BigGovernment</a> Website has picked up this story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2010/01/05/obamas-and-napolitanos-new-security-tactics-detaining-michael-yon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lt. Col. Allen West &#8211; &#8216;Nuff Said</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/12/16/lt-col-allen-west-nuff-said/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/12/16/lt-col-allen-west-nuff-said/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lt. Col. Allen West]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What more can I add?  I&#8217;ll let him do the talking -he does it so articulately.</p>
<p>Congressional Candidate Speech</p>
<p>Sean Hannity Interview</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What more can I add?  I&#8217;ll let him do the talking -he does it so articulately.</p>
<p><a title="Lt. Col. Allen West" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank">Congressional Candidate Speech</a></p>
<p><a title="Lt. Col. Allen West" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/16/video-the-belated-yet-obligatory-lt-col-allen-west-rallies-the-base-clip/" target="_blank">Sean Hannity Interview</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/12/16/lt-col-allen-west-nuff-said/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the Conservatives!</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/11/04/return-of-the-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/11/04/return-of-the-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the election victories yesterday were due not only to conservatives, but also in large part to moderates who, like their conservative counterparts, have been repulsed by Obama&#8217;s naive foreign policies and his economic disaster at home.</p>
<p>Conservatives make up 40% of the country&#8217;s electorate and could not have pulled this off alone.  Moderates make up another 40%.  Liberals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the election victories yesterday were due not only to conservatives, but also in large part to moderates who, like their conservative counterparts, have been repulsed by Obama&#8217;s naive foreign policies and his economic disaster at home.</p>
<p>Conservatives make up 40% of the country&#8217;s electorate and could not have pulled this off alone.  Moderates make up another 40%.  Liberals come in last, representing the smallest fraction of the country’s voters with 20%.</p>
<p>Now of course, the Democrats and the White House are spinning yesterday’s victories as meaningless, and are trying their best to convince everyone who will listen that yesterday&#8217;s elections are not a referendum on Obama and his policies.  In fact, Robert Gibbs, responding to a question, said that <a title="Obama watches a special on himself" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/11/04/obama-watched-hbo-special-about-himself-instead-election-results" target="_blank">President Obama was watching the HBO special on himself</a> (modest much?).  If this is how he truly feels, then why did Obama throw his support to Deeds and visit New Jersey five times to campaign for Corzine?  Perhaps the truth is that the he and the Democrats do care.  And right now, they&#8217;re scared.</p>
<p>Now, NY-23 is a huge lesson for the GOP, which clearly mismanaged the election there.  By supporting conservative-in-name-only Dede Scozzafava, and ignoring Doug Hoffman, they failed to to understand their own electorate.  Once Scozzafava dropped out and threw her support to Democrat Bill Owens, she showed her true colors.  Only then did the GOP begin supporting Doug Hoffman, though they failed to mention his name in their ads.  And as Michelle Malkin suggests, <a title="Conservatives owe Hoffman gratitude" href="http://michellemalkin.com/" target="_blank">conservatives owe Hoffman tremendous thanks</a>.</p>
<p>Going forward, the GOP will learn from their mistakes and realize that the country is terrified by Obama&#8217;s policies, and does not want a moderate/liberal conservative.  Good job conservatives in getting their vote out and taking NJ and VA.  We&#8217;re back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/11/04/return-of-the-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Upside Down Priorities</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/obamas-upside-down-priorities/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/obamas-upside-down-priorities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As James Taranto called out in his editorial article yesterday, Obama clearly needs to re-examine his priorities.  Instead of whooping it up about mopping floors at fundraisers and campaigning for incumbent governors, he should be focused on our tens of thousands of soldiers risking their lives in a deadly war in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>President Obama, Commander-in-Chief, please attend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As James Taranto called out in his <a title="Obama Goes AWOL: On Afghanistan, &quot;voting present&quot; would be an improvement." href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704500604574485461450697346.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" target="_blank">editorial article </a>yesterday, Obama clearly needs to re-examine his priorities.  Instead of whooping it up about <a title="Obama, Our Mopper In Chief?" href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/10/obama_our_mopper_in_chief.html?ft=1&amp;f=103943429" target="_blank">mopping floors</a> at fundraisers and campaigning for incumbent governors, he should be focused on our tens of thousands of soldiers risking their lives in a deadly war in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>President Obama, Commander-in-Chief, <em>please</em> attend to your real obligations, and sit down with U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates!</p>
<p>Source: <a title="James Taranto" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704500604574485461450697346.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/obamas-upside-down-priorities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All the King&#8217;s Men (and Women) &#8212; Obama&#8217;s Disturbing Appointees</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/all-the-kings-men-and-women-obamas-disturbing-appointees/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/all-the-kings-men-and-women-obamas-disturbing-appointees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cede]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>During the 2008 Presidential Campaign, Obama said: “Judge me by the people who surround me.”  If only the voters had done just that back then.  Of course, we all heard about Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, and we heard Obama distance himself from them, or try to anyway.  Despite all that, Bill Ayers was certainly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2008 Presidential Campaign, Obama said: “Judge me by the people who surround me.”  If only the voters had done just that back then.  Of course, we all heard about Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, and we heard Obama distance himself from them, or try to anyway.  Despite all that, Bill Ayers was certainly a friend, and there’s considerable evidence that he helped Obama write his book, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dreams from my Father</span>.  Jeremiah Wright was his pastor for 20 years.  No one believes that Obama hadn&#8217;t heard any of Wright’s hateful speeches on America.  But the people of this country voted for him anyway</p>
<p>Well, now that Obama has been in office for 9 months, let’s turn it around and see who he has surrounded himself with (the most <em>important one</em> is at the very end of this post!):</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>John Holdren – </strong><strong>Science Czar</strong>: He has long been concerned with overpopulation.  In 1973, he felt that the U.S. was already in danger of overpopulation, say that &#8220;<a title="John Holdren's Paper" href="http://www.npg.org/pospapers/1973.html" target="_blank">210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many</a>.&#8221;  In 1977, he co-authored a book called &#8220;EcoScience&#8221; with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, in which he advocated forced sterilization.  He has also advocated that we &#8220;de-develop&#8221; the United States, and has maintained that infants and the elderly are not ‘human’.  He has yet to recant those viewpoints, or propose revised statements.  Check out<a title="John Holdren" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/15/study-in-contrasts-christian-scientist-vs-eco-mad-scientist/" target="_blank"> Michelle Malkin’s many articles</a> on him.</li>
<li><strong>Van Jones – Green Jobs Czar:</strong>A self-proclaimed Marxist, Van Jones has since resigned (on a Sunday morning at 12:01am in an effort to avoid a lot of press).  Yet, President Obama and Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett seem quite enthralled with him when they chose him.  Van Jones is a 9/11 trutherand signed a petition on September 12, 2001 calling for an investigation of then President Bush.  He has made numerous racial remarks, like this one: “The white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people of color communities because they don’t have a racial justice frame.”</li>
<li><strong>Anita Dunn – White House Communications Director:</strong> Recently, she held up <a title="Anita Dunn" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2FVEe7wCzs" target="_blank">Mao Tse Tung alongside Mother Teresa</a>as her two favorite political philosophers.  She tried to wave this off later, saying the juxtaposition of these two figures was a joke, but that’s hard to believe when she continues on discussing the history of Mao versus Chiang Kai Shek.  And she plainly says that these are “…the two people I turn to most.”  Really?  Has she forgotten about the <em>40 million</em> people he had killed during his reign over China?  Is that really who she turns to when looking for a political philosopher?  And she is the White House Communications Director.  Great pick Obama.</li>
<li><strong>Ron Bloom – Manufacturing Czar</strong>:  Apparently, Ron Bloom does not believe in the <a title="Ron Bloom" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27cXXirAIw4" target="_blank">free market system</a>: “We know that the free market is nonsense.”  And during the same speech, he quotes Mao Tse Tung: “We kind of agree with Mao that political power comes largely from the barrel of a gun.”  Wow.</li>
<li><strong>Cass Sunstein – Regulatory Czar</strong>: A Harvard law professor, she believes that animals have the right to legal representation.  &#8216;Nuff said.</li>
<li><strong>Mark Lloyd – FCC Diversity Officer</strong>: Mark Lloyd refers to <a title="Mark Lloyd" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF2C235fD7o" target="_blank">Hugo Chavez&#8217;s takeover of Venezuela</a> as an <em>incredible revolution</em>.  <em>Really?!</em>   More importantly considering his role, he is opposed to private ownership of media.  In other words, he believes in state-run media.</li>
</ol>
<p>There are others who have criminal records (adult criminal records, not juvenile criminal records that are sealed), and others with disturbingly extreme ideas.</p>
<p>What do all these people that President Obama has surrounded himself with say about him?  How should we judge Obama?  These selections demonstrate, at the very least, poor judgment, and at the most, an intent to radically alter this country.  Not convinced?</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ve saved the worst for last: President Obama himself.  In December of this year, Obama will travel to Copenhagen to sign a treaty that will <em><span style="color: #ff0000;">explicitly cede U.S. sovereignty</span></em>.  Lord Christopher Monckton spoke on October 14, 2009 in St. Paul, <a title="Lord Christopher Monckton" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40" target="_blank">where he described exactly how this will happen</a>.  And unless the people of this country rise up now, it will be too late to ever take it back.  Our Consititution, our  way of life for the last 230+ years, is about to radically change for the worse.</p>
<p>America, we didn’t listen to the warnings during the campaign.  Now that he is President, are we going to start paying attention?</p>
<p>For Lord Chrisopher Monchton&#8217;s full speech, watch it <a title="Lord Christopher Monckton" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0" target="_blank">here</a>.  Sign the petition opposing Cap and Trade <a title="Sign the petition" href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?page_id=560" target="_blank">here</a>.  Visit <a title="Global Climate Scam" href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=572" target="_blank">Global Climate Scam&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/21/all-the-kings-men-and-women-obamas-disturbing-appointees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now the White House Wants to Control the Press</title>
		<link>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/</link>
		<comments>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackholethoughts.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that can&#8217;t be true.  That must be more anti-Obama dribble.  Unfortunately, when you look back over the last few weeks, it&#8217;s hard to avoid that conclusion.  The White House&#8217;s David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel pounded Fox News again this past weekend.  While simmering for months, this fight exploded a couple of weeks ago when Anita Dunn claimed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that can&#8217;t be true.  That must be more anti-Obama dribble.  Unfortunately, when you look back over the last few weeks, it&#8217;s hard to avoid that conclusion.  The White House&#8217;s <a title="David Axelrod: Fox News &quot;Not Really A News Station&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-w7-G8PLyc" target="_blank">David Axelrod</a> and <a title="Rahm Emanuel on White House's War with Fox News" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzKc-kxEP1A" target="_blank">Rahm Emanuel</a> pounded Fox News again this past weekend.  While simmering for months, this fight exploded a couple of weeks ago when Anita Dunn claimed that the Fox News Channel is &#8220;opinion journalism masquerading as news,&#8221; and then said:</p>
<blockquote><p>The reality of it is, Fox News often operates as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican party</p></blockquote>
<p>She goes on to refer to Fox News as the &#8220;<a title="Anita Dunn: Fox News is not a news organization" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls" target="_blank">opposition</a>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s obvious then that the <a title="Fox 'not really news,' says Axelrod" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28417.html" target="_blank">White House</a> doesn&#8217;t want the rest of the media to consider Fox News a <em>news</em> station.  That should send shivers down your spine.</p>
<p>If it didn&#8217;t, it should have.  Let me explain why.  First, what is the White House trying to achieve?  Doesn&#8217;t it seem <a title="Anita Dunn: Fox News Is &quot;Research Arm of the Republican Party&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls" target="_blank">petty and beneath the office of the President of the United States of America</a> to be criticizing one particular news organization?  So then why are they doing it?</p>
<p>Three reasons (hat tip to<a title="White House: Media shouldn't follow Fox" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28497.html" target="_blank">Josh Gerstein and Mike Allen of Politico</a> for pointing this out):</p>
<ol>
<li>Redirect certain liberals, who may feel President Obama has abandoned them, by focusing them on Fox News</li>
<li>Keep Fox News, which is so often critical of Obama&#8217;s administration, on the defensive</li>
<li>And most importantly, send a message to other journalists who might be considering following in the the footsteps of Fox News</li>
</ol>
<p>Now certainly, that third one should have gotten your attention.  Let&#8217;s review how the press is supposed to work in the U.S.A.:</p>
<ol>
<li>The First Amendment to the Constitution of this country affords the people with the freedom of the press.</li>
<li>In return for free press, it is the responsibility of journalists to challenge our elected and non-elected government officials.</li>
<li>And it is the responsibility of the people to reject any attempts by the government to influence or control the press, or for the press to collude with the government.  Socialist, communist and essentially all totalitarian governments ensure their grasp on power by controlling the information that their citizens consume.</li>
</ol>
<p>We&#8217;re not quite to the point of #3 above, but we are surely moving toward it.  And that&#8217;s what&#8217;s so scary.</p>
<p>Notice that the White House <em>did not comment </em>on CNN or MSNBC when they falsely attributed racist comments to Rush Limbaugh without any fact checking.  Neither of those organization has even apologized or retracted those reports.  Instead, the White House is focusing its attention on just one news organization, Fox News.  So clearly, there is a double standard here.</p>
<p>If you are a news organization, what you are hearing is: if you agree with the White House, then you are safe.  If you ask difficult or uncomfortable questions, then the White House will slap you down.</p>
<p>Forget transparency.  Forget change.  The message is: <em>Don&#8217;t question us</em>.</p>
<p>What should we the people do?  In response to this blatant arrogance and disrespect for our freedoms, we should join together and let the President know that his administration is moving in an extremely dangerous direction.  Call the <a title="Contact the White House" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/" target="_blank">White House, or email them</a>.  Don&#8217;t let them tread on our Consitution.</p>
<p>Sources: <a title="Today’s Qs for O’s WH – 10/20/2009" href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/todays-qs-for-os-wh-10202009.html" target="_blank">ABC&#8217;s Jake Tapper poses question to Robert Gibbs</a>, <a title="Obama Advisers Say Fox News Isn't News" href="http://news.aol.com/article/white-house-advisers-say-fox-news-is-not/722055" target="_blank">AOL News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackholethoughts.com/2009/10/20/now-the-white-house-wants-to-control-the-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
